Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:4239 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
21.05.25
CRLR No. 368 of 2023 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.
Ms. Sarita Bisht, counsel for the revisionist.
2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State.
3. Ms. Kajri Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
4. The present criminal revision petition has been filed challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 18.05.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar whereby the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. (the criminal procedure then was) filed by respondent no.2 was partly allowed and a maintenance amount of ₹20,000/- per month was awarded in favour of respondent no.2/minor daughter of the revisionist.
5.
Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that in compliance with the directions of this Court dated 24.03.2025 both parties appeared before the Mediator appointed by the Member Secretary, Uttarakhand State Legal Services Authority for mediation proceedings held on different dates.
He would further submit that the mediation proceedings were successful and the parties have amicably resolved their dispute on mutually agreed terms and conditions as recorded in the settlement/agreement dated 05.05.2025, in Mediation Case No. 21 of 2025 titled Riya vs. State of Uttarakhand & another, before the Mediation Centre, Nainital.
6. In view of the amicable settlement and considering that both parties have agreed to abide by the terms of the compromise, this Court is of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present revision
2025:UHC:4239 pending.
7. Accordingly, the criminal revision petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement/agreement dated 05.05.2025 which shall form part of this order.
8. Pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed of.
(Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.)
21.05.2025 Mamta