Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7915 (CAL)

SAJAL DEY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/2136/2024 · 2025-01-29

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ASR 34. Ct. no. 24. 29.1.2025 WPA 2136 of 2024 With CAN 1 of 2024 Sajal Dey Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay Mr. Ritesh Kumar Ganguly ……..For the State respondents State is represented through learned counsel. None appears on behalf of the petitioner No accommodation is sought for. It appears on the earlier occasion the petitioner was also absent. Considering the situation it appears that the petitioner not atall interest to proceed further with the matter. According the instant writ petition is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, passed by this court during the pendency of the instant writ petition is also vacated. [Subhendu Samanta, J]