SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1061 of 2025 BA1 No. 1064 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sunny Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. These two bail applications have been moved separately by ‘Vishal Singh’ S/o Chandrabhan Singh and ‘Bhure’ S/o Surendra Hal praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 18.05.2025 bearing FIR No. 10 of 2025 P.S. Salt, District Almora, wherein, both the applicants are implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20 read with Section 60 of NDPS Act. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that both the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated and the alleged contraband ganja which is shown to be recovered is from a joint recovery and is non-commercial quantity. He further submits that there is no substantial compliance of Sections 52, 55 and 58 of NDPS Act. 5. Apart from this, he submits that without FSL analysis the prosecution comes to the conclusion that the alleged contraband, which is shown to be recovered is Ganja. He further submits that both the applicants have no previous criminal history. 6. On the other side, learned A.G.A. have not disputed this fact that both the applicants have no previous criminal history and there is a joint recovery and the contraband ganja which is shown to be recovered is non-commercial quantity, however, he apprise to this court that the investigation is still going on and the chargesheet has not been filed. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the alleged contraband ganja which is shown to be recovered from both the applicants is non-commercial quantity. Furthermore, both the applicants have no previous criminal history, which has not been disputed by the learned A.G.A., therefore, this court is of the view that both the applicants deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail applications are allowed. 9. Let both the applicants namely Vishal Singh and Bhure be released on bail on furnishing their personal bonds and two sureties by each of them to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail both the applicants shall cooperate with the pending investigation and will not make any attempt to influence any of the witnesses and furthermore if the applicants found to be indulged in any criminal activity in future the prosecution is directed to move an application for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 07.07.2025 PR