Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79139 (KAR)

SMT HONNAMMA v. SRI DYAMAPPA

CRP/699/2024 · 2025-12-19

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54726 CRP No. 699 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 699 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: SMT. HONNAMMA W/O LAXMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O HOLEHATTI VILLAGE, HOLALURU 2ND HOBLI, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 216. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR T.M, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. DYAMAPPA S/O SINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O HOLEHATTI VILLAGE, HOLALURU 2ND HOBLI, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 216. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RANJITHKUMAR R.S, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.08.2021 PASSED ON IA NO II IN OS NO.544/2020 ON THE FILE OF V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIVAMOGGA, DISMISSING THE IA NO. II FILED Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54726 CRP No. 699 of 2024 UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 R/W SEC. 151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the revision petitioner. There is a delay of 1078 days in filing the revision petition. Learned counsel for the respondent appeared through video conference. Order under revision is dismissing the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure. On perusal of the stage of the suit through NJDG, matter is now listed for recording of the evidence. In the affidavit, in support of I.A.No.1/2024, expect stating that there was a revive petition filed vide I.A.No.2/2024 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54726 CRP No. 699 of 2024 and on account of the old age, the order could not be challenged earlier is as bald as anything. Anyway, since the revision petitioner has not chosen to address the arguments on I.A.No.1/2024, revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35