Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79137 (ALL)

NIJAM CHISHTI AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/26783/2025 · 2025-07-27

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:124248 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 26783 of 2025 Applicant :- Nijam Chishti And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Pankaj Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Tej Bhan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 6522 of 2024, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 17.02.2025 by which the learned Magistrate took cognizance under Sections 333, 115(2), 110, 352, 351(3) of B.N.S. (under Sections 452, 323, 308, 504, 506 of I.P.C.), Police Station- Sahawar, District Kasganj, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state that, in category A, one would expect a better exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Ishan Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad