SUKHPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7578/2025 · 2025-07-17
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79135 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79135 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-7578-2025
Date of decision: 17.07.2025
SUKHPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER
...PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Mudit Johar, Advocate for
Mr. Manu Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners.
****
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
1.
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking issuance of directions to official respondent i.e. respondent No.2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent No.3 i.e. private respondent.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major and are residing together, in live-in relationship but the said relationship is not acceptable to respondent No.3 and he is threatening to petitioners with dire consequences. The petitioners apprehend danger to their life and liberty from respondent No.3 and in this regard, submitted a representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken so far.
3.
Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4.
Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners MANISHA 2025.07.18 11:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7578-2025 2
is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for the State during the course of the day.
5.
Without commenting on the validity of their relationship and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law.
6.
It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) July 17, 2025
JUDGE manisha
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable
Yes/No MANISHA 2025.07.18 11:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document