Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79130 (PNJ)

M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. v. UDAYA SINGH AND ANOTHER

CWP/25089/2019 · 2025-05-28

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209-5 Decided on :28.05.2025 1. CWP-25089-2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus UDAYA SINGH AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents 2. CWP-25123 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus RAMESH CHAND AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents 3. CWP-25618 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus RAJESH YADAV AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents 4. CWP-32738 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus SHAMBHU RAY AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents 5. CWP-32746 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus RIYA 2025.05.28 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25089-2019 (O&M) and connected matters -2- IMRAN KHAN AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Shashi Kumar Yadav, Advocate for respondent No. 1- in all cases. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner-company. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that the petitioner-company has been closed and probably, due to this reason, petitioner must have lost the interest in pursuing the present remedy. . 3. Keeping in view of the above, the present petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.. 5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 28.05.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.05.28 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document