M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. v. UDAYA SINGH AND ANOTHER
CWP/25089/2019 · 2025-05-28
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79130 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79130 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209-5 Decided on :28.05.2025
1.
CWP-25089-2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus UDAYA SINGH AND ANOTHER
. . . Respondents
2.
CWP-25123 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus RAMESH CHAND AND ANOTHER
. . . Respondents
3.
CWP-25618 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus RAJESH YADAV AND ANOTHER
. . . Respondents
4.
CWP-32738 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus SHAMBHU RAY AND ANOTHER
. . . Respondents
5.
CWP-32746 -2019 (O&M) M/S JINUS METAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. . .Petitioner Versus RIYA 2025.05.28 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-25089-2019 (O&M) and connected matters -2- IMRAN KHAN AND ANOTHER
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Shashi Kumar Yadav, Advocate for respondent No. 1- in all cases. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner-company.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that the petitioner-company has been closed and probably, due to this reason, petitioner must have lost the interest in pursuing the present remedy. .
3. Keeping in view of the above, the present petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of..
5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 28.05.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.05.28 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document