HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16615 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents and perused the material brought on the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the first informant in the instant case. However, police after concluding the investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet against the respondent Nos.4, 5 & 6 and as such, no cause of action survives in the instant matter and the instant petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, if the petitioner is still having any further grievance, he may approach the concerned Magistrate for redressal of the same. September 15, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lallan Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Kausal Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad