Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79102 (ALL)

AJEET SINGH AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NABAIL/6122/2025 · 2025-07-31

Vivek Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129268 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6122 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajeet Singh And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Sharma,Vijay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicants, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in Case Crime No. 45 of 2025 under Sections 147, 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471, 452, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station Ghiror, District Mainpuri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicantd submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. The sale-deed was executed in favour of the father of the applicants in the year 1991 by grandmother of the informant. The alleged will-deed pertaining to the said land was executed on 17.02.2016. The case is purely civil in nature. The informant has already instituted civil suit in the Court of Civil Judge (II), Junior Division, Mainpuri registered as Suit No. 115 of 2024. The said civil suit is still pending consideration. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicants with the offence. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The investigation is still pending. It is next submitted that the applicants have apprehension of their arrest and in case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Counsel for the applicants further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants and the fact that the case is purely civil in nature, the informant has already instituted civil suit in the Court of Civil Judge (II), Junior Division, Mainpuri registered as Suit No. 115 of 2024, the said civil suit is still pending consideration, at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicants, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicants- Ajeet Singh, Surjeet, Prabhakar, Aditya Yadav, Deepak Yadav, Kuldeep Kumar and Atijesh be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants. 10. The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 11. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Sachin Mishra Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad