p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.747 of 2025 Sankar Prasad Mishra …. Petitioner None -versus- Kali Prasanna Mohapatra, Director, Department of Higher Education, Odisha, Heads of Department Building, Bhubaneswar and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. U.R. Jena, A.G.A. for O.P.No.1 Mr. N.R. Panda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Purohit Advocate for O.P. No.2 CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 12.03.2026 Order No. I.A. No.158 of 2026 06. 1. Mr. N.R. Panda, learned counsel submits on behalf of Mr. S.K. Purohit, learned counsel, that though he appeared for Opposite Party No.2, but inadvertently in order dated 12.02.2026, he has been shown as counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2. In view of such submission, the expressions “Mr. N. Panda, learned counsel on behalf Mr. A.K. Pattnaik, learned counsel for the Petitioner” mentioned in the order dated 12.02.2026 is corrected as “Mr. N.R. Panda, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. S.K. Purohit, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2”. So also, the expressions, “Mr. N. Panda, Advocate on behalf of” be Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Mar-2026 17:54:19 Signature Not Verified p. 2 deleted from the cause title and the expressions, “Mr. N.R. Panda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Purohit, Advocate for O.P. No.2” be reflected in the cause title as against Opposite Parties. The rest part of said order remains unaltered. 3. The I.A. is disposed of. ( B.P. Routray) Judge B.K. Barik