Anju Devi Loukham v. Laishram Deben Singh Director Jnims And 3 Ors
MC(CONT.CAS(C))/11/2024 · 2025-05-29
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 791 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 791 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
P a g e 1 | 2
Clubbed with MC[CONT. CAS(C)] No. 11 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
CONT. CAS(C) No. 32 of 2024
Anju Devi Loukham … Petitioner - Versus -
Laishram Deben Singh, Director JNIMS & 5 Ors. … Respondents
B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K. SOMASHEKAR
O R D E R
30.05.2025
The learned counsel for the petitioner namely, Ms. N. Diana appears before this Court physically securing the service of the learned senior counsel namely, Mr. T. Momo appearing through video conferencing in the proceeding of CONT. CAS(C) No. 32 of 2024.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks a short accommodation.
Whereas, the learned senior counsel namely, Mr. N. Ibotombi appears for the respondents No. 3 and Mr. Juno Rahman, learned counsel appears for the respondents No. 1 & 2 before this Court physically.
In the present contempt proceeding in CONT. CAS(C) No. 32 of 2024, the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 submits that order of the Ld. Single Judge passed in W.P.(C) No. 56 of 2020 dated 19.04.2023 has been challenged by referring an appeal in KHOIROM BIPINCHAN DRA SINGH Digitally signed by KHOIROM BIPINCHANDRA SINGH Date: 2025.05.30 16:47:14 +05'30'
P a g e 2 | 2
the proceeding of W.A. No. 47 of 2023 which is pending before the Ld. Division Bench and therefore, there is no consequence for consideration of relief as sought for in the contempt proceeding which is initiated against the respondents under the provision of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971.
Keeping in view of the status of the writ appeal pending for consideration of the order of the Ld. Single Judge, it is deemed appropriate that the contempt proceeding is hereby disposed of for the presently.
However, liberty is granted to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner for consideration of a fresh contempt proceeding after disposal of the pending writ appeal.
Accordingly, the present proceeding is hereby disposed of.
Consequent upon the disposal of the main proceeding in CONT. CAS(C) No. 32 of 2024, the connected proceeding in miscellaneous application in MC[CONT. CAS(C)] No. 11 of 2024 is also hereby disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE Bipin