[2025:RJ-JP:8668] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2871/2025 Balveer Kumar Chordia Adopted Son Of Late Shri Birdichand, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Bapu Bazar, Bijaynagar, District Ajmer, At Present Resident Of B-28, New Light Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Siddhraj Son Of Shri Gulabchand, Proprietor, Oswal Medial Store, Opposite General Hospital, Beawar-Bijaynagar Road, Bijaynagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 27/02/2025 1. This civil writ petition has been filed to issue direction to learned Additional District Judge No.3, Beawar to decide the appeal no.06/2022 titled as Siddhraj Vs. Balveer Kumar Chordia within a period of three months. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order for eviction in favour of the petitioner-landlord has been passed by Civil Judge, Bijainagar, District Ajmer in Civil Suit No.22/2018 on 14.03.2022. Against the said order, the respondent-tenant has preferred an appeal, which is pending before the Court of Additional District Judge No.3, Beawar (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’). He further submits that as the appeal was not decided by the Appellate Court, therefore, the petitioner had [2025:RJ-JP:8668] (2 of 2) [CW-2871/2025] to approach this Court by filing a Civil Writ Petition No.2638/2024 and the same was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 01.03.2024. 3. On 01.03.2024 following order was passed:- “In the eventuality of the petitioner making a prayer before the Appellate Court for time bound disposal, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, to conclude the matter as expeditiously as possible in facts of the case.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in compliance of the order of this Court passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2638/2024, the petitioner moved an application before the Appellate Court to dispose of the appeal expeditiously, however, no heed was paid by the Appellate Court and the Appellate Court fixed the matter in a routine manner and long dates are being given. 5. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the Appellate Court be directed to dispose of the appeal expeditiously without giving any unnecessarily adjournment and this writ petition may be disposed of. 6. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of and the learned Additional District Judge No.3, Beawar is directed to dispose of the appeal no. 06/2022 titled as Siddhraj Vs. Balveer Kumar Chordia at the earliest without giving any unnecessarily adjournment to the petitioner. 7. The stay application also stands disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /32