Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7909 (AP)

Chakali Hanumanna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5100/2021 · 2025-01-02

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010082702021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5100/2021 Between: Chakali Hanumanna, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.D.Viswakanth Babu, learned counsel, representing Mr.G.V.Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. 2 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed. _________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Date: 02.01.2025 ARR 3 HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO Writ Petition No.5100 of 2021 Date: 02.01.2025 ARR