Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47783 MFA No. 7109 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7109 OF 2024 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
SHRI KUMAR K S/O KARI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.14, CHOWDAIAH BLOCK, HMT LAYOUT, R.T.NAGAR, BENGALURE – 560 032.
…APPELLANT (BY SMT. K SHEELA ANISH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT BHAGAYAMMA W/O LATE DYAVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
2.
SHRI MANOHAR D, S/O LATE DYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.87, 4TH CROSS, KUDURE FROM ROAD, AGRAHARA, JAKKUR, BENGALURU NORTH – 560 064
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SURESH N., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47783 MFA No. 7109 of 2024
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.06.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.3438/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, (SCCH- 18) BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL WITH COURT COSTS AND INTEREST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Advocates for both side present and appellant as well as respondent Nos.1 and 2 are present.
2. A joint memo is filed which is signed by both the appellant and his advocate, respondent Nos.1 and 2 and their advocate. On enquiry, both the appellant and respondent Nos.1 and 2 admit that they know the contents of the joint memo and also admit that the matter is settled as per the terms of the joint memo.
3. As per the joint memo, learned counsel for the appellant handed over Demand Draft of Rs.2,00,000/- drawn on Union Bank, RT Nagar Branch, bearing
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47783 MFA No. 7109 of 2024
No.368818 dated 14.11.2025. He further submits that Rs.1,00,000/- is paid in cash, today.
4. The terms of compromise is legal and valid and the same is accepted. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.
Draw award according to the joint memo.
Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 3 Sl No.: 5