APHC010082872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1815/2025 Between: 1. NEMANI VENKATA ADITYA @ ADITYA @ N VENKATA ADITYA, S/O VENKATA SATYA JAGANNADHA MURALIDAR AGED 29 YEARS. RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 303, BALAJI TOWER, BMPS ROAD, PRASADAMPADU VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, (S.H.O PATAMATA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P. AMARAVATHI. 2. NEMANI VENKATA SATYA JAGANNADHA MURALIDAR, S/O. SOMESWARA RAO, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O. F.NO. 303, BALAJI TOWERS, PRASADAMPADU, PRASADAMPADU(POST), RAMAARAPPADU, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI I.A. Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and Criminal Petition No:1815 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/Accused, to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.46 of 2024, on the file of the learned IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vijayawada City, NTR District. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing for the unofficial respondent No.2 (defacto- complainant). Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State and Police are present. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioner herein/Accused and 2nd respondent herein are present before this Court. They produced their respective Aadhaar cards in proof of their identity. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and police have identified both the parties in the open Court. 3 4. This Court has questioned 2nd respondent herein/de facto complainant with regard to compromise, and he categorically stated to that extent that he has voluntarily entered into compromise with the petitioner herein/Accused. This Court is satisfied with the identification of the parties and voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. In view of the compromise between the parties, the chances of conviction are remote and bleak. 5. In the light of judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & another1, on quashing of criminal case, when the parties entered into settlement and compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed and therefore, the proceedings in P.R.C.No.46 of 2024, on the file of the learned IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vijayawada City, NTR District is hereby quashed. 6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 and Criminal Petition No.1815 of 2025 are allowed. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. ____________________ _ B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI, J 25-02-2025 Pmk 1 2012 (9) Scale 257 4 38 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL PETITION NO:1815 of 2025 Date: 25.02.2025 Pmk