Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010035712024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/650/2024 HANIF ALI S/O SYED ALI VILLAGE BANGLIPARA, PO JANIA, PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND 2 ORS A COMPANY REGISTERED AND INCORPATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3, MIDDLETON STREET, KALKATA AND ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, GUWAHATI, ASSAM. 2:SRI DINESH TALUKDAR @ DINESH CH. TALUKDAR S/O LATE HARENDRA NATH TALUKDAR R/O BLOCK D ROOM NO. D-102 HOUSING COMPLEX NATBOMA P.O. and P.S. HATIGAON GUWAHATI 781038 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. 3:MIZANUR RAHMAN S/O SHAJAHAN ALI VILLAGE TATELITOL PO BARPULLAH PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MR H A AHMED Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : MR M Z SHAH (R-3), MS. U ROY (R1),MRS. S ROY (R1) Linked Case : Review.Pet./174/2025 DINESH TALUKDAR @ DINESH CH. TALUKDAR S/O LATE HARENDRA NATH TALUKDAR R/O BLOCK D ROOM NO. D-102 HOUSING COMPLEX NATBOMA P.O. and P.S. HATIGAON GUWAHATI 781038 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. VERSUS THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LT. AND 2 ORS B A COMPANY REGISTERED AND INCORPATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3 MIDDLETON STREET KALKATA AND ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER GUWAHATI ASSAM. 2:HANIF ALI S/O SAYED ALI RESIDENT OF BAGLIPARA PO JANIA PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 3:MIZUNUR RAHMAN S/O S. ALI RESIDENT OF TALELITOL PS AND DIST BARPETA PO BARPULLAH ASSAM Page No.# 3/3 ------------ Advocate for : S I AKAND Advocate for : MRS. S ROY appearing for THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LT. AND 2 ORS B BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 03.09.2025 Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mrs. S. Roy, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. S I Akand, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 381 days in preferring the connected review petition. I have gone through the application as well as the objection filed by the respondent no. 1. I find that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The connected review petition shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant