BALAYOGINI SRI SRI SRI MANIKYESWARI MATHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/4540/2025 · 2025-07-20
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7904 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7904 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010082672025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 4540 OF 2025 Between:
1. BALAYOGINI SRI SRI SRI MANIKYESWARI MATHA, SRI SUKA ASHRAMAM, A SOCIETY REGISTRED UNDER THE SOCIETIES ACT, 1860 WITH REGD. NO. 133/1987 AND HAVING ITS LOCATION AT JALAGANGA, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, BEING REP. BY ITS IN-CHARGE CHAIRMAN B.V.SIVA RAO, S/O. NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 26-1-148, MAIN ROAD, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE COMMISSIOPER OF ENDOWRHENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE COMMISSIOPER OF ENDOWRHENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 3. SRI BRAMARAMABHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, REP BY ITS. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BRAMARAMBHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BRAMARAMBHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. E CHANDRA SEKHARA REDDY, THE THEN IN-CHARGE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SRI BRAMARAMABHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM,
SRISAILAM, PRESENTLY WORKING AS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
SRI BRAMARAMABHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2 respondent in not consider the petitioners representation dated 25-01- 2025 is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the and violative of the Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution consequently direct the 2 principle of the natural justice of India and respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 25-01-2025 by passing speaking orders in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation, dated 25-01-2025 by following due process of law, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOTHA LEELA GANESH RAGHAVENDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION)
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 4540 OF 2025 The Court made the following:
Heard Sri Kotha Leela Ganesh Raghavendra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments and Sri T.Venu Gopal, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 25.01.2025, filed for conducting an enquiry into the irregular grant of permission in favour of Sri Sri Sri Mahayogini Rooparahitha Ahimsa Yogishwara Veera Dharmaraja Matha. 3. Sri T. Venu Gopal, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4, has submits that the permission, earlier accorded to the said Sri Sri Sri Mahayogini Rooparahitha Ahimsa Yogishwara Veera Dharmaraja Matha has been withdrawn vide proceedings Rc.No.E2/5734/2024, dated 15.07.2025. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, as the grievance of the petitioner is resolved. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 21.07.2025 BSK
58 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 4540 OF 2025
Date: 21.07.2025 BSK