CR-5579-20 IN THE HIG 241 M/s RB Mill Anoop Singh CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP have laid ch by the learne 632 of 2019 whereby the allowed by f following or 2019 (O&M) -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA B Mills and another Versus Singh Gill M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. BS Bali, Advocate for the p Mr. RK Bamal, Advocate for th I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present rev aid challenge to the order dated 17.07 learned Appellate Authority, U.T. Ch f 2019, titled as ‘M/s RB Mill and an by the application filed by the respo d by fixing the same at highly excessi On 11.09.2019, when this c ing order was passed by a co-ordinate “Ld. Counsel for the peti the petitioners-defendants M contigous to that of anoth Corporation under the same l 6078 of 2018, a Co-ordinate Be dated 12.09.2018 (Annexure P mesne profits against the sa existing rent of Rs.40/- per sq order was passed, by the learne fact, even though copy of the record of the Ld. Lower Court No. 119-120. Notice of motion for 14.1 D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-5579-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2025 .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA r the petitioners. for the respondent. ent revision petition, the petitioners 17.07.2019 (Annexure P-1), passed .T. Chandharh in Rent Appeal No. and another vs. Anoop Singh Gill’, respondent for mesne profits was xcessive rate. this case was listed for hearing, dinate Bench of this Court:- petitioners inter alia submits that Mill happens to be situated nother tenant M/s R.D. Sales me landlord, and that in CR No. te Bench of this Court vide order e P-6) had provisionally assessed e said co-tenant at the rate of er sq. ft., and that the impugned arned Courts below, ignoring this the aforesaid judgment is on the ourt (Appellate Authority) at page 14.11.2019. ners ssed No. , was ring, at ed les o. ed of ed his he ge RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.22 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-5579-20 aforemention bearing CR dismissed by 08.11.2024. learned coun that the insta 20.01.2025 rishu 2019 (O&M) -2- In the meantime, mesne petitioner is provisionally redu pending the final disposal on imposed upon the petitioner/t 6078 of 2018 in the order date shall apply, in the present case the tentative mesne profit by pet To come up on 14.11.20 Civil Revision.” Learned counsel for the par entioned CR-6078-2018 along with g CR-1662-2020, CR-1663-2020 sed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Co 2024. Copy of order dated 08.11.202 d counsel for the petitioner is taken on e instant revision petition may also be Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable esne profit assessed against the reduced to Rs. 5500/- per month merits. All other conditions as ner/tenant in Civil Revision No. dated 12.09.2018 (Annexure P-6) ase also for the purpose of paying y petitioners, as assessed today. 1.2019 date fixed in the aforesaid e parties are ad idem that the g with other connected revisions 2020 and CR-1664-2020, stand this Court vide common order dated .11.2024, handed over in Court by ken on record. Thus, it is submitted lso be dismissed in the same terms. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No he th as o. 6) ng id the ions ated t by itted RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.22 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.