M/S BHARATH CHARITABLE CANCER HOSPITAL AND INSTITUTE v. MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT
CCC/386/2025 · 2025-12-19
K S Mudagal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79027 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79027 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54426-DB CCC No. 386 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 386 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
M/S BHARATH CHARITABLE CANCER HOSPITAL AND INSTITUTE OFFICE AT No.371/F, 3RD FLOOR PRESTIGE SHOPPING ARCADE RAMASWAMY CIRCLE MYSORE - 570 005 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIARMAN DR. B.S. AJAI KUMAR …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI ANKIT MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI RAVI SHANKAR R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JLB ROAD, MYSURU - 570 002 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER SRI S. PALAIAH
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEKAR ROAD
Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54426-DB CCC No. 386 of 2025
BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY …ACCUSED (BY SRI S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA FOR R-2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SUMMON, PROSECUTE AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED No.1, FOR DELIBERATE AND WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 02.11.2018 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN WRIT PETITION NO.26998/2013 (LB-RES) PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54426-DB CCC No. 386 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The learned counsel for the complainant seeks to withdraw the present complaint.
2. The complaint is accordingly closed.
3. It is clarified that this order would not preclude the complainant from availing other remedies albeit in accordance with law.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE
KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6