ESTMAN CAST AND FORGE LIMITED v. AIRBRICK INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED
ARB/761/2025 · 2026-04-16
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 790 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 790 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
262 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-761-2025 Date of decision: 16.04.2026 EASTMAN CAST AND FORGE LIMITED ...Applicant(s) VERSUS AIRBRICK INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED ...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Sushant Kareer, Advocate and Ms. Sukhleen, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Satyam Aneja, Advocate, Mr. Randeep Sachdeva, Advocate and Ms. Ravinder Kaur, Advocate for the respondent. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)
1. On being confronted with regard to the non-issuance of notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, learned counsel for the applicant has prayed for withdrawal of the present arbitration case in
order to enable the applicant to file afresh after completing the requisite formalities of issuing an appropriate notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) 16.04.2026 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2026.04.17 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.