Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78987 (KAR)

SMT. VANDANA RANGARAO POL v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER

WP/23144/2025 · 2025-09-17

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37015 WP No. 23144 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 23144 OF 2025 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SMT. VANDANA RANGARAO POL D/O RANGARAO POL AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 20, JANATHA FLAT, NEAR DYSP OFFICE, GOKAK TALUK BELAGUM DISTRICT BELGAUM- 591 307 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. AISHWARYA HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SATISH K., ADVOCATE) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER BANGALORE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, (COMES UNDER GOVT) DEPOT NO 26, NORTH ZONE, K H ROAD, CENTRAL OFFICE, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU- 560 027. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE HONBLE III ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE IN RESPECT OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21/02/2024 PASSED IN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 670/2021 (ANNEXURE-A) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21/02/2024 PASSED BY HONBLE III ADDITIONAL LABOUR Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37015 WP No. 23144 of 2025 COURT, BENGALURU IN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 670/2021 IN SO FAR AS WITHHOLDING OF ONE ANNUAL INCREMENT WITH CUMULATIVE EFFECT AND NON-GRANT OF FULL BACK WAGES TO PETITIONER IS CONCERNED (ANNEXURE-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE SAID INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 670/2021 AS SOUGHT FOR BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HONBLE TRIAL COURT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent are present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. 3. The memo is placed on record. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67