IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP-20433-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 10, 2025 RAMESH SANKA -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. A written request for adjournment has been circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, the request is declined. 2. Since one of the reliefs yearned to be reaped through instituting the instant writ petition appertains to protection of petitioner’s life and liberty, it is informed to this Court by the learned State counsel that, during pendency of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has been arrested and he is in judicial custody. Therefore, the prayer for protection of life and liberty is rendered infructuous. 3. Moreover, one of the other reliefs claimed by the petitioner in the instant writ petition is for quashing of FIR, for which the apposite remedy to be availed by the petitioner, and as prescribed in this High Court’s Rules and Orders, is to institute a criminal main petition (CRM- M), therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to re-access this Court on the same cause of DEVINDER YADAV 2025.01.14 09:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-20433-2024 (O&M) 2 action, but, by instituting an appropriate motion under the apt provisions of law. 4. Pending application(s) stand disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) January 10, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.01.14 09:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment