MUKHTAR AHMAD WANI v. HIGH COURT OF JK AND ANR (HCOURT)
SWP/956/2018 · 2025-05-15
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7897 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7897 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 10
Regular Cause list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SWP No. 956/2018
Mukhtar Ahmad Wani ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Sikander Hayat, Advocate vice Mr. Faisal Qadri, Sr. Advocate
V/s High Court of J&K and Anr. ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Shah Aamir, Advocate Mr. F. N. Shah, GA Mr. Aatir Kawoosa, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
(ORDER) 15.05.2025
In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to respondents to create adequate promotional avenues for Photostat Assistants. There is further direction sought to club the posts of Photostat Assistants with the Junior Assistants, so that they can get further promotional avenues. As per reply affidavit filed by the High Court, the matter has been taken up with the Government, however, the response from the Government is awaited. It has been brought to our notice that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner stands superannuated. If that be the position, the reliefs claimed in the writ petition, even if accepted to be tenable in law, cannot be granted. This petition has, for all practical purposes, rendered infructuous. Dismissed, as such, along with all connected CM(s).
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 15.05.2025
“Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document