- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49226 CA No. 223 of 2025 In CA No. 42 of 2024 In COP No. 57 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2025 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2024 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 57 OF 2012 BETWEEN: UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), THROUGH THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR ATTACHED TO THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HAVING OFFICE AT "CORPORATE BHAVAN", NO. 26-27, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. SHRISHAIL NAVALGUND, ADVOCATE FOR OL) AND: 1. UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT UB TOWER, LEVEL 10, NO. 24, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. VINAY SHARMA. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49226 CA No. 223 of 2025 In CA No. 42 of 2024 In COP No. 57 of 2012 2. MS. HINA NAGARAJAN, AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO. 3518, DLF PHASE 4, DLF CITY, GURGAON-122 001, HARYANA. 3. MR. PRADEEP JAIN, AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT A-3-602, UNIWORLD CITY, SECTOR 30/41, GURGAON-122 001, HARYANA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LEKHA CHANDRA SHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAGHURAM CADAMBI, ADVOCATE) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS UNDER CHAPTER X, RULE 1 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA RULES, 1959, READ WITH ORDER VIII, RULE 1A (3) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, SEEKING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Lekha Chandrashekar., counsel on behalf of Sri.Raghuram Cadambi., for the applicant has appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the applicant submits that the Company Application may be dismissed as having become infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49226 CA No. 223 of 2025 In CA No. 42 of 2024 In COP No. 57 of 2012 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about infructuous of the Company Application and if an order is passed, she shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the applicant is placed on record. 5. Resultantly, C.A.No.223/2025 is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.:1 Sl No.: