ONKARESHWAR MISHRA KARAN ALIAS KARAN MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P.
NA528/27130/2025 · 2025-08-05
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133631 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 27130 of 2025 Applicant :- Onkareshwar Mishra Karan Alias Karan Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shiv Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application U/S 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following prayer:-
"It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to allow the present application and may be please to direct to the court below to release the applicant on the basis of personal bond of the applicant along with two same sureties in total eight following cases :- - (1) Case Crime по. 14 of 2025, Under Section 318(4),338,336(3), 340(2),111(2)(kha), B.N.S., Police Station- Kudh Fatehgarh, District- Sambhal. - (2) Case Crime No. 26 of 2025, Under Section 318(4),316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2),111(2)(kha), B.N.S., Police Station-Gunnaur, District- Sambhal. - (3) Case Crime No. 31 of 2025, Under Section 318(4),351(2),316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2),111(2)(kha), B.N.S., Police Station- Gunnaur, District- Sambhal. - (4) Case Crime No. 50 of 2025, Under Section 318(4),338, 336(3), 340(2),61(2)(ka), 111(2)(kha), B.N.S., Police Station- Rajpura, District- Sambhal. - (5) Case Crime no. 153 of 2025, Under Section 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 111(2)(kha),B.N.S., Police Station- Bahjoi, District- Sambhal. - (6) Case Crime no. 30 of 2025, Under Section 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 111(2)(kha), B.N.S., Police Station- Baniyather, District- Sambhal. - (7) Case Crime no. 187 of 2025, Under Section-420,467,468,471 LP.C., Police Station- Billari, District- Moradabad. - (8) Case Crime no. 13 of 2025, Under Section- 318(4),336(3), 338,340(2),111(2)B, 61(2)(ka) B.N.S., Police Station- Rajpura, District- Sambhal, so the justice be done. And/or pass such order or further orders which this Hon'ble court deem fit and proper as per the facts of the case. So the Justice be done otherwise the applicant shell suffered irreparable losses and injuries which cannot be compensated in any terms."
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is involved in eight criminal cases of the same nature. Bail has been granted to him in all the cases by this Court or by trial court.
It is argued that as bail has been granted in all the cases against the applicant, he is unable to file separate bail bonds and surety bonds, hence he may be permitted to file a personal bond and two sureties in one case which may be treated in all the said 08 cases. Learned counsel has relied upon the order passed by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. State of U.P.: S.L.P. (Crl) No. 8914-8915/2018 decided on 29.10.2018, the
order dated 12.05.2021 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in U/S 482/378/407 No.-1974 of 2021 (Shiv Shankar Gautam vs. State of U.P.), the order dated 28.06.2022 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No.-15989 of 2022 (Sunil Chak vs. State of U.P. and another) and the order dated 18.07.2022 also passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/S 482 No. 19972 of 2022 (Jitendra Gupta @ Jeetu vs. State of U.P. and another) and has argued that in the said matters the situation was identical and the courts ordered filing a personal bond and two sureties in one case which was
directed to be treated to be valid in all the other cases and was
directed to be deemed to be an adequate compliance of all the other bail orders for release of the applicant. It is argued that as such appropriate directions to the said effect be passed.
4. Learned A.G.A. for the State could not dispute the said proposition and also orders as relied upon by learned counsel for the applicant.
5. After having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the records and the facts of the case and orders relied by
learned counsel for the applicant, it is provided that the applicant shall be released in all the 08 cases which have been mentioned in paragraph 9 of the affidavit in support of application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties to the like amount (one of the sureties to be a local person
and other will be of family member of the applicant) which shall hold good for all the 08 cases.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the present application stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad