Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/15 WPMS No.1723 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Ms. Shruti Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos.1 and 4. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he was allotted a plot in the year 2004 by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation at Bhimtal, District Nainital. Now, some persons are trying to grab the land. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks that the respondents may be directed to remove the unauthorized interference by the unknown land grabbers. Related reliefs are also claimed. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2/ SIDCUL Uttarakhand would submit that based on the representation made by the petitioner, the land of the petitioner has already been demarcated. There is no encroachment on the property of the petitioner. It is the claim of the petitioner that some persons are trying to encroach upon his land, which was allotted to him by SIDCUL Uttarakhand. This may give rise to a cause to file civil suit. In the writ petitions, such claims may not be decided. Even otherwise, on behalf of the respondent no.2/SIDCUL Uttarakhand, it is stated that the land of the petitioner has already been demarcated and there is no encroachment on it. In view of it, there is no merit in the writ petition. It stands disposed of accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 20.06.2025 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df4d 1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450A8 4B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.06.20 17:28:03 +05'30'