MD. ASRAR ALIAS ASRAR RAJA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1900/2025 · 2025-03-27
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7886 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7886 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1900 of 2025
------
1. Md. Asrar @ Asrar Raja, Son of Mubarak Ansari, aged about 21 years.
2. Md. Zubair Ansari, Son of Mubarak Ansari, aged about 19 years, Both are Resident of Village –Bundu, P.O. Bundu, P.S. –Keredari, Dist. Hazaribagh.
… Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, Advocate ------
Order No.02 Dated- 27.03.2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.109 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457/380 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners committed theft of motorcycle of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-9 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the stolen motorcycle has already been recovered. It is further submitted that the co-accused –Altamas to save his skin has falsely implicated the petitioners in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribagh, in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.109 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-