- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48384 CRP No. 747 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 747 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SMT. THANGAMMA. A. U. AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O LATE A. UTHAPPA, R/AT NO. 64, 3RD MAIN, 4TH CROSS, SOMESHWARANAGARA, GKVK POST, BENGALURU - 65, PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 5/1/78, 4TH CROSS, ATTUR LAKE, CHITRA LAYOUT, VTC VEERASAGARA, BENGALURU - 64, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH KIRAM SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVI L. VAIDYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O LATE V. HANUMANTHAIAH, 2. SRI. ANAND H., AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE V. HANUMANTHAIAH, 3. SRI. JAGADISH H., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE V. HANUMANTHAIAH, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48384 CRP No. 747 of 2025 4. SMT. SUMA H., AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, D/O LATE V. HANUMANTHAIAH, W/O RAMESH K. V., ALL ARE R/AT NO. 583, VEERAHANUMANILAYA, 5TH MAIN, HAVANOOR EXTENSION, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU - 73. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H. ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 AND R4; SRI. SARIMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.09.2025 PASSED ON I.A. IN OS.NO.1584/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, a memo is filed by learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Memo reads as under: “The petitioner named above respectfully submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above petition with liberty to seek appropriate available remedy before the Trial Court regarding maintaining of the counter claim in the interest of justice and equity.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48384 CRP No. 747 of 2025 Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed. However, all contentions available to the parties shall be canvassed before the Trial Court in accordance with law and withdrawal of the revision petition shall not affect the revision petitioner in the pending trial. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41