Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26947-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1090 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vipin Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Maurya,Roopesh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A for the State respondents. 2. This writ petition is preferred praying for the following principal relief: "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quash the impugned First Information Report dated 12.12.2024 registered as Case Crime No.386 of 2024, under Section 319(2), 318(4), 316(2) 352 B.N.S. and Section 66 I.T. Act, Police Station-Madiyahu, District-Jaunpur (Annexure No.1 to this Writ Petition). b)Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 12.12.2024 registered as Case Crime No.386 of 2024, under Section 319(2), 318(4), 316(2) 352 B.N.S. and Section 66 I.T. Act, Police Station-Madiyahu, District-Jaunpur." 3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. informs the Court that during the investigation, Sections 319(2) of B.N.S. and 66 of the I.T. Act have been deleted. He further submits that the investigation has already been completed, and a chargesheet against the petitioner has been submitted before the competent court on 02.02.2025. 4. Confronted with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is aggrieved, he may avail the remedy as available in law. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 27.2.2025 NLY Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad