Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:KER:31192 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2127 OF 2020 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2127 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.2147 OF 2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
JULIET D'COUTH AGED 51 YEARS W/O. STANSFIELD D COUTH, RESIDING AT S.J VILLA MOONGODE P.O.
OTTOOR VILLAGE AND NOW RESIDING AT GOD S GIFT, SWAPA HOUSE, AGRA 59/B, AKSHAYA GARDENS , NALACHIRA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695015. BY ADV NIHARIKA HEMA RAJ RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 MADHAVIKUTTY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695043. 2 SANJAY JACOB, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, VARKARA TALUK, VARKALA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695045. 2025:KER:31192 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2127 OF 2020 2 BY ADVS. SURAJ KUMAR SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL SREEKUMAR SMT. DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR.GOVT.PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:31192 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2127 OF 2020 3 T.R. RAVI, J. -------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C). No.2127 of 2020 in W.P.(C) No.2147 of 2020 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2025 JUDGMENT When the case is taken up, the Government Pleader placed before me the instructions which has been sent on 09.04.2025, which says that the construction in the form of the compound wall has already been demolished. In the above circumstances, this Contempt case is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to agitate the claim regarding the user of the puramboke road in appropriate proceedings. The counsel for the impleading petitioners in I.A.No.1/2025 submitted that the petitioners therein are preferring a review against the judgment. It is made clear that, this court is only deciding the contempt case and not any other matter. Sd/- T.R. RAVI
JUDGE Pn
2025:KER:31192 CON.CASE(C) NO.
2127 OF 2020 4 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2127/2020 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE-A TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 13.04.2016 OF ADDITIONAL TEHSILDAR VARKALA NO.K3- 42109/2011 ANNEXURE0-B TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NOS 4441 OF 2017 AND 18401 OF 2016 DATED 14.02.2019 ANNEXURE-C CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.2147 OF 2020 DATED 25.02.2020 ANNEXURE-D TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 11.03.2020 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE-E TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 11.03.2020 SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE-F TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.06.2020 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE-G TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.06.2020 SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER