Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78819 (ALL)

SHABNAM v. State of UP AND ANOTHER

CRLR/3691/2024 · 2025-09-10

Madan Pal Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3691 of 2024 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present. 2. After matter was argued at some length, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he does not want to press the present criminal revision and therefore, the same be dismissed as not pressed. 3. To the above submission, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. have no objection. 4. Under such circumstances, this criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed. September 11, 2025 Sushil/- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Pushpraj Sahu, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sushil Kumar Shukla, G.A., Varun Ojha (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Shabnam .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad