APHC010082392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4503/2025 Between: Yenubarla Chittemma ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Munduru Eswar Brahmanand Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. S PRANATHI 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4503/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.0.08 cents in Sy.No.100A of Nekkallu Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District without following due process of law and trying to allocate house sites in the land belonging to the petitioner herein is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the respondents are not entitled for allocation of the house sites in the land belonging to the petitioner herein and pass such other order.” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s husband and his brother were given land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.04 cents each in survey No.100A of Nekkallu Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District. Subsequently, they have temporarily constructed a house in the said land. The land given to the petitioner’s husband’s brother was left to the petitioner’s husband. After the demise of the petitioner’s husband, the petitioner inherited the said property. Thereafter, the petitioner constructed a permanent house in the said land and she has been residing in the 3 said property. The petitioner is also paying property tax to the said house. While things stood thus, the 2nd respondent allocated the said land to some other third parties. Now, the respondent authorities are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property without following the due process of law. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 4. Learned Government Pleader for the respondents submits that in the event of dispossession of the petitioner from the subject property, the respondents will follow due process of law. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property without following due process of law. 6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 20.02.2025 TTPPSS 4 54 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4503/2025 20.02.2025 TTPPSS