Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78805 (KAR)

B SHIVAKUMAR v. SRI K S SUNIL GUPTA

CCC/376/2022 · 2025-09-18

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38700-DB CCC No. 376 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 376 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. B. SHIVAKUMAR S/O C. BALARAMAN AGED 47 YEARS R/AT No.CD 27 SRIRAMNAGAR BENGALURU-560 017 2. S. MOHAN AGED 70 YEARS S/O SANJEEVI V. R/AT No.124 AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT NEAR ROYAL ORCHID RING RD. DOMLUR BENGALURU-560 071 3. PADMANABA REDDY S/O LATE N. MUNIYAPPA AGED 53 YEARS R/AT No.241, GROUND FLOOR NEAR HERO HONDA SHOWROOM Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38700-DB CCC No. 376 of 2022 AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT DOMLUR, BENGALURU-560071 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE - (ABSENT)) AND: SRI. K.S. SUNIL GUPTA S/O SRI. V. SRINIVAS GUPTA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT No.S-711, MANIPAL CENTRE DICKENSON ROAD, BENGALURU-560 071 …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 05.03.2020 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP No.50/2020 (PIL) AND PASS SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER ORDERS AS DEEMED FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38700-DB CCC No. 376 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) Learned counsel for the accused/respondents submits that the writ petition was dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and as such, the interim order compliance of which is complained of in this contempt petition, merges with the main order. In view of the above submission, nothing survives for further consideration. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is dropped. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1