Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7880 (KAR)

SHRI VADDU VEERESH PROP M/S VEERESH CONTRACTOR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/107077/2024 · 2025-03-21

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5196 WP No. 107077 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107077 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. VADDU VEERESH PROP: M/S VEERESH CONTRACTOR, WARD NO.30, GUNDE NAGAR, ALLIPURA, CANTAONMENT, BALLARI, TQ: AND DIST: BALLARI, BALLARI P.C.-583 104. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYAN G.RASALKAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (ADMINISTRATION), DGSTO/DVO, DAVANAGERE DN, DAVANAGERE, TALUKA AND DISTRICT DAVANAGERE, PC. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT-2), VANIJYE THERIGE BHAVAN, II STAGE, 6TH CROSS, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5196 WP No. 107077 of 2024 ANANTHAPURA ROAD, BALLARI, TQ: AND DIST: BALLARI, BALLARI-583 104. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANGADHAR J.M. AAG A/W SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Narayan G.Rasalkar., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Gangadhar J.M., AGA along with Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil., HCGP for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition in terms of the memo and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5196 WP No. 107077 of 2024 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 32