A.HEMALATA v. RAJ KISHORE PATTANAYAK,TAHASILDAR,KUKUDAKHANDI,GANJAM
CONTC/5021/2025 · 2026-02-24
Ananda Chandra Behera
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 788 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 788 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5021 of 2025 A.Hemalata ..... Petitioner
Represented by Adv. - Sthiti Pragyan Sunandini -versus- Raj Kishore Pattanayak, Tahasildar, Kukudakhandi, Ganjam ..... Opposite Parties
Represented by Adv. - Mr.G.Mohanty, SC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
ORDER 24.02.2026
Order No.
03.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the alleged contemnor are present.
3. As per the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the contempt petition is closed and the Petitioner file a fresh demarcation application for demarcating her land before the Tahasildar, Kukudakhandi.
4. As such, the contempt petition is disposed of finally.
( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA)
Judge Binayak