COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT DR ANOOPOLAL BANSAL BALIKA INTER COLLEGE JAHANGIRABAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/10785/2025 · 2025-07-30
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78796 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78796 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:127898 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10785 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Dr Anoopolal Bansal Balika Inter College Jahangirabad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Awasthi,Shaili Ganguly Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tanuj Shahi Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash the impugned
order dated 03.07.2025 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Bulandshahr, respondent no.2 (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition). ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the District Inspector of Schools, Bulandshahr to forthwith approve the resolution dated 29.06.2025 whereby respondent no.3 has been removed from her duties to be passed within stipulated period of time which may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India."
2. Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, after some argument, without entering into merits of the case made an innocuous prayer that the District Inspector of Schools, Bulandshahr may be directed to pass a fresh order, after hearing to both the parties, in accordance with law, in time bound manner.
3. Sri K. Shahi, learned counsel appearing on advance notice on behalf of respondent no.3 and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents opposed the writ petition on merits, but have not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
4. Heard Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioners, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, Sri K. Shahi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
5. Since, the matter is not pressed on merits, only made an innocuous prayer, taking into consideration of the submissions made by both the parties, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Respondent no.2, the District Inspector of Schools, Bulandshahr is directed to pass a fresh order after hearing to both the sides, without influencing from the impugned order dated 03.07.2025, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad