CRM-M-37013-2025 238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Gurmail Singh and another State of Punjab CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Mr. Gaurav Gurcharan S. Rai, Senior DAG Punjab. SUMEET GOEL 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner 22.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections (3), 61(2), 324 (4) of the B 1959, at Police Station Ludhiana. 2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present petition by the petitioner “Statement of Mandeep Singh s/o Surjit Singh s/o Ajmer Sin Mandevilla lane seres Sudhar, District Ludhiana, aged about 56 years, mobile no. 95921 61156. Stated that I am A resident of the above to Punjab from California in Singh s/o Bharpur Singh r/o Savaddi Kalan are owners of land measuring 31 acres, situated at Village Taraf Kotli and Munabbarpur. Till March 2024, I and my brother in law Tejinder Singh had given our land on l 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Singh and another Versus Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Jasdeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Gurcharan S. Rai, Senior DAG Punjab. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section for grant of regular bail to the petitioner registered for the offences punishable under Sections (3), 61(2), 324 (4) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Sidhwan Bet, Police District Ludhiana Rural, District The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present petition by the petitioners) is as follows:- Statement of Mandeep Singh s/o Surjit Singh s/o Ajmer Sin Mandevilla lane seres-ca-95307 U.S.A., currently residing at Mohi, P.S. Sudhar, District Ludhiana, aged about 56 years, mobile no. 95921 61156. Stated that I am A resident of the above to Punjab from California in November 2024. Land my brother in law Tejinder Singh s/o Bharpur Singh r/o Savaddi Kalan are owners of land measuring 31 acres, situated at Village Taraf Kotli and Munabbarpur. Till March 2024, I and my brother in law Tejinder Singh had given our land on lease for cultivation to Jatinderjit Singh s/o Bhawandeep 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37013-2025 Date of decision: July 21, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Gurcharan S. Rai, Senior DAG Punjab. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, for grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.85 dated registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 190, 191 and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, Sidhwan Bet, Police District Ludhiana Rural, District The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present Statement of Mandeep Singh s/o Surjit Singh s/o Ajmer Singh r/o 1612 95307 U.S.A., currently residing at Mohi, P.S. Sudhar, District Ludhiana, aged about 56 years, mobile no. 95921 61156. Stated that I am A resident of the above-mentioned address and I came November 2024. Land my brother in law Tejinder Singh s/o Bharpur Singh r/o Savaddi Kalan are owners of land measuring 31 acres, situated at Village Taraf Kotli and Munabbarpur. Till March 2024, I and my brother in law Tejinder Singh had ease for cultivation to Jatinderjit Singh s/o Bhawandeep 1 2025 , 2025 Petitioners ….Respondent 483 of the BNSS, ated 109, 190, 191 and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, Sidhwan Bet, Police District Ludhiana Rural, District The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present gh r/o 1612 95307 U.S.A., currently residing at Mohi, P.S. Sudhar, District Ludhiana, aged about 56 years, mobile no. 95921- mentioned address and I came November 2024. Land my brother in law Tejinder Singh s/o Bharpur Singh r/o Savaddi Kalan are owners of land measuring 31 acres, situated at Village Taraf Kotli and Munabbarpur. Till March 2024, I and my brother in law Tejinder Singh had ease for cultivation to Jatinderjit Singh s/o Bhawandeep MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.21 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-37013-2025 Singh r/o Tiharha. After March, I had myself sown the crop on this land. On 25.03.2025, case FIR No. 61 dated 25.03.2025 u/s 329, 303(2) BNS, P.S. Sidhwan Bet was registered against Gagandeep Singh etc. on my statement. Then on 14.04.2025, information was given by my known persons that Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh and Prabhsharan Singh s/ Gagandeep Singh r/o House No. 10, Street No. 01, New Agar Nagar, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana, P.S. Sa District Ludhiana along with 30 crop which was sown by me. In this regard, i made a complaint at 112 and police after reaching the spot restrained them from harvesting the crop: Both the parties were my known person that Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh along with Gurmail Singh s/o Gurdial Singh and residents of Gholian Khurd, and Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir residents of Kashipur, Uttarakhand along with 7 to harvest the my father in law Bharpur Singh s/o Hameer Singh, r/o Sabdin Kalan, Gurmail Singh Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, Narinder Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, residents of Mohi and Avtar Singh s/o Balbir Singh r/o Sawadhin Kalan, Gurpreet Singh s/o Jasvir Singh r/o Dolewal, Basti Kaseana, D vehicle make Safari bearing no. PB PB wheat crop. We parked th along with him Gurmail Singh s/o Gurdial Singh, Jaswinder Singh s/o Kartar Singh r/o Gholian Khurd, Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir Singh and Harjit Singh r/o Kashipur, Uttarakhand and 7 hiding there along with their respective weapons. In the meantime Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh fired a shot at us with the intention to kill us and thereafter, his associates Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir Singh and Harjit S us with the intention to kill us. One shot hit the side door of the vehicle make Safari bearing no. PB vehicle. One shot passed over my head Gurpreet Singh s/o Jasvir Singh r/o Village Moga with the intention to kill him, which hit Gurpreet Singh in the abdomen. They fired more shots at us with the intention to kill us. My 2025 Singh r/o Tiharha. After March, I had myself sown the crop on this land. On 25.03.2025, case FIR No. 61 dated 25.03.2025 u/s 329, 303(2) BNS, P.S. Sidhwan Bet was registered against Gagandeep Singh tc. on my statement. Then on 14.04.2025, information was given by my known persons that Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh and Prabhsharan Singh s/ Gagandeep Singh r/o House No. 10, Street No. 01, New Agar Nagar, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana, P.S. Sa District Ludhiana along with 30-40 persons are trying to harvest the wheat crop which was sown by me. In this regard, i made a complaint at 112 and police after reaching the spot restrained them from harvesting the crop: Both the parties were given time. Today, at about 10:00 A.M., 1 came to know from my known person that Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh along with Gurmail Singh s/o Gurdial Singh and residents of Gholian Khurd, and Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir residents of Kashipur, Uttarakhand along with 7 to harvest the wheat crop and to take the possession. On which, I along with my father in law Bharpur Singh s/o Hameer Singh, r/o Sabdin Kalan, Gurmail Singh s/o Channan Singh, Balwant Singh s/o Kishan Singh, Kohinoorpreet Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, Narinder Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, residents of Mohi and Avtar Singh s/o Balbir Singh r/o Sawadhin Kalan, Gurpreet Singh s/o Jasvir Singh r/o Dolewal, Basti Kaseana, D vehicle make Safari bearing no. PB-10EA PB-10HQ-4477 situated in Villages Munabarpur and Taraf Kotli to see the wheat crop. We parked our cars on the main passage and as we alighted from the said vehicles in the passage, Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh and along with him Gurmail Singh s/o Gurdial Singh, Jaswinder Singh s/o Kartar Singh r/o Gholian Khurd, Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir Singh and Harjit Singh r/o Kashipur, Uttarakhand and 7-8 hiding there along with their respective weapons. In the meantime Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh fired a shot at us with the intention to kill us and thereafter, his associates Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir Singh and Harjit Singh residents of Kashipur, Uttarakhand also fired shots at us with the intention to kill us. One shot hit the side door of the vehicle make Safari bearing no. PB-10EA-1882 and another shot hit at the tire of the said vehicle. One shot passed over my head Gurpreet Singh s/o Jasvir Singh r/o Village Moga with the intention to kill him, which hit Gurpreet Singh in the abdomen. They fired more shots at us with the intention to kill us. My 2 Singh r/o Tiharha. After March, I had myself sown the crop on this land. On 25.03.2025, case FIR No. 61 dated 25.03.2025 u/s 329, 303(2) BNS, P.S. Sidhwan Bet was registered against Gagandeep Singh tc. on my statement. Then on 14.04.2025, information was given by my known persons that Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh and Prabhsharan Singh s/ Gagandeep Singh r/o House No. 10, Street No. 01, New Agar Nagar, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana, P.S. Sarabha Nagar, 40 persons are trying to harvest the wheat crop which was sown by me. In this regard, i made a complaint at 112 and police after reaching the spot restrained them from harvesting the crop: Both given time. Today, at about 10:00 A.M., 1 came to know from my known person that Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh along with Gurmail Singh s/o Gurdial Singh and Jaswinder Singh s/o Kartar Singh, residents of Gholian Khurd, and Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir Singh, Harjit Singh residents of Kashipur, Uttarakhand along with 7-8 unknown persons are trying wheat crop and to take the possession. On which, I along with my father in law Bharpur Singh s/o Hameer Singh, r/o Sabdin Kalan, Gurmail s/o Channan Singh, Balwant Singh s/o Kishan Singh, Kohinoorpreet Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, Narinder Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, residents of Mohi and Avtar Singh s/o Balbir Singh r/o Sawadhin Kalan, Gurpreet Singh s/o Jasvir Singh r/o Dolewal, Basti Kaseana, District Moga came to my fields in 10EA-1882 and my own Thar bearing no. 4477 situated in Villages Munabarpur and Taraf Kotli to see the our cars on the main passage and as we alighted from e said vehicles in the passage, Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh and along with him Gurmail Singh s/o Gurdial Singh, Jaswinder Singh s/o Kartar Singh r/o Gholian Khurd, Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir Singh and Harjit Singh r/o 8 unknown persons were already hiding there along with their respective weapons. In the meantime Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh fired a shot at us with the intention to kill us and thereafter, his associates Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir ingh residents of Kashipur, Uttarakhand also fired shots at us with the intention to kill us. One shot hit the side door of the vehicle make 1882 and another shot hit at the tire of the said vehicle. One shot passed over my head and one shot was fired at my associate Gurpreet Singh s/o Jasvir Singh r/o Village Dolewal, Basti Kaseana, District Moga with the intention to kill him, which hit Gurpreet Singh in the abdomen. They fired more shots at us with the intention to kill us. My associate Narender 2 Singh r/o Tiharha. After March, I had myself sown the crop on this land. On 25.03.2025, case FIR No. 61 dated 25.03.2025 u/s 329, 303(2) BNS, P.S. Sidhwan Bet was registered against Gagandeep Singh tc. on my statement. Then on 14.04.2025, information was given by my known persons that Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh and Prabhsharan Singh s/ Gagandeep Singh r/o House No. 10, Street rabha Nagar, 40 persons are trying to harvest the wheat crop which was sown by me. In this regard, i made a complaint at 112 and police after reaching the spot restrained them from harvesting the crop: Both given time. Today, at about 10:00 A.M., 1 came to know from my known person that Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh along with Jaswinder Singh s/o Kartar Singh, Singh, Harjit Singh 8 unknown persons are trying wheat crop and to take the possession. On which, I along with my father in law Bharpur Singh s/o Hameer Singh, r/o Sabdin Kalan, Gurmail s/o Channan Singh, Balwant Singh s/o Kishan Singh, Kohinoorpreet Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, Narinder Singh s/o Gurmail Singh, residents of Mohi and Avtar Singh s/o Balbir Singh r/o Sawadhin Kalan, Gurpreet Singh s/o istrict Moga came to my fields in 1882 and my own Thar bearing no. 4477 situated in Villages Munabarpur and Taraf Kotli to see the our cars on the main passage and as we alighted from e said vehicles in the passage, Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh and along with him Gurmail Singh s/o Gurdial Singh, Jaswinder Singh s/o Kartar Singh r/o Gholian Khurd, Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir Singh and Harjit Singh r/o unknown persons were already hiding there along with their respective weapons. In the meantime Prabhsharan Singh s/o Gagandeep Singh fired a shot at us with the intention to kill us and thereafter, his associates Kuldeep Singh s/o Kulbir ingh residents of Kashipur, Uttarakhand also fired shots at us with the intention to kill us. One shot hit the side door of the vehicle make 1882 and another shot hit at the tire of the said and one shot was fired at my associate Dolewal, Basti Kaseana, District Moga with the intention to kill him, which hit Gurpreet Singh in the abdomen. associate Narender MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.21 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-37013-2025 Singh arranged a vehicle and where he was referred to DMC Ludhiana. This attack was perpetrated with the backing of (sheh par) Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh r/o House No.10, Sarabha Nagar, District Ludhiana and Jamail Singh s/o Kala Singh r/o Krishnapura Kalan, P.S. Dharmkot, District Moga. The said incident was witnessed by Narinder Singh s/o Gurmail Singh r/o Mohi gave information regarding the occurrence. The reason behind the said occurrence is that a dispute regarding our land is going on. After seeing the police party, above persons fled away from the spot in the vehicle make Thar along wit against them. I have got my statement recorded, heard and found correct. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner are in custody since petitioners have counsel has further offence of Section 109 of per the case of the prosecution. most, the petitioners has been attributed to the petitioners. submitted that the petitioners are said to be arraigned as accused primarily on account of being co petitioners and hence no useful purpose would be served petitioner in custody. In this view of the matter, learned counsel has prayed for the grant of regular bail 4. Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition arguing that the allegations raised do not deserve the concession of the regular bail. Learned State counsel seeks to 2025 Singh arranged a vehicle and took Gurpreet Singh to Civil Hospital, Jagraon, where he was referred to DMC Ludhiana. This attack was perpetrated with the backing of (sheh par) Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh r/o House No.10, Street No. 01, New Agar Nagar, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana, P.S. Sarabha Nagar, District Ludhiana and Jamail Singh s/o Kala Singh r/o Krishnapura Kalan, P.S. Dharmkot, District Moga. The said incident was witnessed by Narinder Singh s/o Gurmail Singh r/o Mohi gave information regarding the occurrence. The reason behind the said occurrence is that a dispute regarding our land is going on. After seeing the police party, above persons fled away from the spot in the vehicle make Thar along with their respective weapons. Action be taken against them. I have got my statement recorded, heard and found correct. Learned counsel for the petitioner in custody since 22.04.2025. Learned counsel has further s have been falsely implicated into the further iterated that no fire shot or any other injury invoking the of Section 109 of BNSS, 2023 is attributable per the case of the prosecution. Learned counsel has further argued that most, the petitioners are alleged to be armed has been attributed to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are said to be arraigned as accused primarily on account of being co-assailants, but no specific role has been attributed to the and hence no useful purpose would be served petitioner in custody. In this view of the matter, learned counsel has prayed for grant of regular bail to the petitioners. Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition arguing that the allegations raised against the petitioners are serious in nature and thus the not deserve the concession of the regular bail. Learned State counsel seeks to 3 took Gurpreet Singh to Civil Hospital, Jagraon, where he was referred to DMC Ludhiana. This attack was perpetrated with the backing of (sheh par) Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh r/o Street No. 01, New Agar Nagar, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana, P.S. Sarabha Nagar, District Ludhiana and Jamail Singh s/o Kala Singh r/o Krishnapura Kalan, P.S. Dharmkot, District Moga. The said incident was witnessed by Narinder Singh s/o Gurmail Singh r/o Mohi. I called at 112 and gave information regarding the occurrence. The reason behind the said occurrence is that a dispute regarding our land is going on. After seeing the police party, above persons fled away from the spot in the h their respective weapons. Action be taken against them. I have got my statement recorded, heard and found correct.” Learned counsel for the petitioners has iterated that the petitioner Learned counsel has further submitted that the implicated into the FIR in question. Learned fire shot or any other injury invoking the attributable to the petitioners, even as Learned counsel has further argued that, at the alleged to be armed with danda and no specific injury Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are said to be arraigned as accused primarily on assailants, but no specific role has been attributed to the and hence no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody. In this view of the matter, learned counsel has prayed for Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition arguing that are serious in nature and thus the not deserve the concession of the regular bail. Learned State counsel seeks to 3 took Gurpreet Singh to Civil Hospital, Jagraon, where he was referred to DMC Ludhiana. This attack was perpetrated with the backing of (sheh par) Gagandeep Singh s/o Pal Singh s/o Duman Singh r/o Street No. 01, New Agar Nagar, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana, P.S. Sarabha Nagar, District Ludhiana and Jamail Singh s/o Kala Singh r/o Krishnapura Kalan, P.S. Dharmkot, District Moga. The said incident was . I called at 112 and gave information regarding the occurrence. The reason behind the said occurrence is that a dispute regarding our land is going on. After seeing the police party, above persons fled away from the spot in the h their respective weapons. Action be taken the petitioners submitted that the . Learned fire shot or any other injury invoking the , even as at the specific injury Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are said to be arraigned as accused primarily on assailants, but no specific role has been attributed to the by keeping the petitioner in custody. In this view of the matter, learned counsel has prayed for Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition arguing that are serious in nature and thus they not deserve the concession of the regular bail. Learned State counsel seeks to MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.21 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-37013-2025 place on record are taken on record. 5. I have heard counsel available records of the case. 6. The petitioner investigation was carried out and challan raised by the learned counsel; petitioners an Section 109 of the BNSS, 2023 gone into during the course of trial. delve deep into these rival contentions, at this trial. Nothing tangible has been brought petitioners absconding from the prosecution evidence As per custody certificate counsel, the petitioner than 02 months Suffice to say, further detention of the petitioner not warranted in the facts 7. In view of above, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail on satisfaction of the Ld. concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the petitioners shall remain bound by the following conditions: (i) 2025 place on record the custody certificates dated taken on record. I have heard counsel for the rival available records of the case. The petitioners were arrested on investigation was carried out and challan stands raised by the learned counsel; regarding the specific role attributed to the nd as to whether they can be held liable for the offence under Section 109 of the BNSS, 2023 having added gone into during the course of trial. This Court does delve deep into these rival contentions, at this trial. Nothing tangible has been brought forward to indicate the likelihood of the absconding from the process of justice or interferin prosecution evidence. As per custody certificates dated counsel, the petitioners have already suffered incarceration for a period of more 02 months & are not shown to be involved in Suffice to say, further detention of the petitioner not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. In view of above, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail on their satisfaction of the Ld. concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the shall remain bound by the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not mis 4 dated 21.07.2025 in Court today, which rival parties and have gone through the arrested on 22.04.2025 whereinafter stands presented. The rival contentions garding the specific role attributed to the can be held liable for the offence under having added as the co-assailants or not; shall be This Court does not deem it appropriate to delve deep into these rival contentions, at this stage, lest it may prejudice the forward to indicate the likelihood of the process of justice or interfering with the dated 21.07.2025 filed by learned State already suffered incarceration for a period of more shown to be involved in any other case. Suffice to say, further detention of the petitioners as undertrials are and circumstances of the case. In view of above, the present petition is allowed. Petitioners are their furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Ld. concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the shall remain bound by the following conditions:- shall not mis-use the liberty granted. 4 , which parties and have gone through the whereinafter The rival contentions garding the specific role attributed to the can be held liable for the offence under shall be deem it appropriate to stage, lest it may prejudice the forward to indicate the likelihood of the with the filed by learned State already suffered incarceration for a period of more are are hing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Ld. concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.21 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-37013-2025 (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) 8. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which may be imposed by concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate as directed hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner 9. Ordered accordingly. 10. Nothing said hereinabov opinion on the merits of the case. 11. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. July 21, 2025 mahavir 2025 (ii) The petitioners shall not tamper with any evidence, oral documentary, during the trial. (iii) The petitioners shall not absent before the trial. (iv) The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. (v) The petitioners shall deposit trial Court. (vi) The petitioners shall give Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change their cell permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. (vii) The petitioners shall not in any manner try to delay In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which imposed by concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate as directed hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner Ordered accordingly. Nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: 5 shall not tamper with any evidence, oral documentary, during the trial. shall not absent themselves on any date shall not commit any offence while on bail. shall deposit their passports, if any, with the shall give their cellphone numbers to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and cell-phone numbers without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. shall not in any manner try to delay the trial. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which imposed by concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate as directed hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioners. e shall be construed as an expression of Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 5 or on any date shall not commit any offence while on bail. the the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and prior trial. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which imposed by concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate as directed hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at e shall be construed as an expression of Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.21 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment