Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78749 (ALL)

SMT OMVATI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/24262/2025 · 2025-07-27

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:124566 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24262 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Omvati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Prakash Rai,Veerendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. Petitioner claims that her application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was decided against which private respondent had filed a restoration application which was dismissed against which an appeal was also preferred which has also been dismissed. The order passed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 till date has not been complied with. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition on the ground that order passed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was complied itself in the year 2022 and the pillars were affixed. It appears that it is a personal dispute between the petitioner and private respondent no. 7. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, I find that petitioner has remedy of moving an application under Section 22/23 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before authorities concerned. If the same is moved within 10 days from today, the authority shall consider the same, within next one month. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad