261 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38124-2019 Date of decision: 07.02.2020 SAHIL KUMAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK PURI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Sr. DAG, Punjab. **** VIVEK PURI,J. (ORAL) Even on the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The quashing has been sought on the basis of compromise. The parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court for getting the statements recorded. The report has been received from the Ld. Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, SAS Nagar, Mohali that no one had appeared in the Court for getting the statements recorded and appears that compromise has not been effected between the parties. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite three calls at different intervals. In these circumstances, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 07.02.2020 (VIVEK PURI) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU BALA 2020.02.10 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document