CWP-20177-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 263 BABITA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Ms. Saroj Kumari, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Mehta, DAG, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed respondents from making recovery of excess payment of paid to the petitioner vide memo dated directing them 2. Learned respondents have decided not to effect any recovery pursuant to memo dated pension has already letter dated 28.03.2025 3. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 4. Ordered accordingly. 02.04.2025 Ad 2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Ms. Saroj Kumari, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Mehta, DAG, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a respondents from making recovery of excess payment of paid to the petitioner vide memo dated 07.06.2024, Annexure P them to pay family pension to her. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the respondents have decided not to effect any recovery pursuant to memo dated 07.06.2024, and her already been submitted to the Accountant General, letter dated 28.03.2025. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20177-2024 Decided On: 02.04.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Mehta, DAG, Haryana. seeking a direction to restrain the respondents from making recovery of excess payment of ex-gratia amount 07.06.2024, Annexure P-8, and also State counsel, on instructions, submits that the respondents have decided not to effect any recovery from the petitioner , and her case for releasing of family submitted to the Accountant General, Haryana, vide In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the amount also State counsel, on instructions, submits that the the petitioner case for releasing of family Haryana, vide In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner Aman Dua 2025.04.04 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document