DHARM SINGH MAHAWAR S/O KHAIRATI LAL MAHAWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2550/2025 · 2025-07-22
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7871 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7871 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:27278] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2550/2025 Dharm Singh Mahawar S/o Khairati Lal Mahawar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Torda Farashpura, Tehsil Sikraya, Thana Sikandra District Dausa (Raj.). (At Present Confine In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narensh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 22/07/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.562/2024 registered at Police Station-Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Section 103(1) of BNS 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged charges against the accused-petitioner is that he has caused head injury to the injured which resulted in his death. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is a labourer by profession and on the day of the alleged incident, he was little bit in drunken position. Police, after investigation, has involved him on false and fabricated ground, there is no independent eye witness in the
[2025:RJ-JP:27278] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2550/2025] present case. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.10.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. On the contrary, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that as per the charge- sheet, head injury was caused by the accused petitioner and there is sufficient material exists against the petitioner. Hence, bail application is liable to be rejected.
5. On consideration of rival submissions so also material available on record and deliberating on the facts and circumstances of the case especially in background of the serious nature of charges but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I am not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is dismissed.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J pcg/38