Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78699 (PAT)

Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Ray @ Pankaj Rai v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./70001/2025 · 2025-10-09

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70001 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2024 Thana- Pahelja P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Ray @ Pankaj Rai S/O Ram Barai Ray @ Barai Ray Resident of Village- Manas Naya Panapur, P.S.- Akilpur, District- Saran At Chapra (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pahleja P.S. Case No. 67/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 380, 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with other accused are said to have killed the deceased. They are said to have fired three shots at the deceased. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the entire prosecution story stands falsified from the fact that in the post- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70001 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 mortem report of the deceased only one gun shot injury has been found. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 20.06.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra /concerned Court below in connection with Pahleja P.S. Case No. 67 of 2024. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T