- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42289-DB CCC No. 178 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 178 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SADASHIVA S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT SUNKADAHALLI VILLAGE HARNAHALLY HOBLI PERIYAPATNA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI SUNEEL S NARAYAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. LAKSHMIKANTH REDDY G. AGE: MAJOR DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, MYSURU KRISHNARAJA BOULEVARD ROAD MYSURU MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 001. …ACCUSED 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42289-DB CCC No. 178 of 2025 VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE, HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN W.P.NO.8932/2021 (KLR-RES) DATED 05.02.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - A & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 05.02.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in WP.No.8932/2021 (KLR- RES). In terms of the said order, the writ petition was partly - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42289-DB CCC No. 178 of 2025 allowed and the Deputy Commissioner was directed to comply with the directions as set out to identify the lands and pass orders settling the survey records as well as revenue records. 2. The learned counsel for the accused submits that a comprehensive order dated 08.07.2025 has been passed dismissing the revision petition filed by the complainant. The Deputy Commissioner has found that no original grant records are available in respect of the complainant (revision petitioner). The complainant has availed remedies of assailing the order dated 08.07.2025. 3. In view of the above, we consider it apposite to close the present complaint, while reserving all rights and contentions of the parties in respect of the said order. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE SD, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39