1 2025:CGHC:36879 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 632 of 2020 1 - Seema Singh W/o Shri Santosh Singh Aged About 36 Years R/o Hospital Colony, Bishrampur, Police Station Bishrampur , Tehsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sahil Singh S/o Shri Santosh Singh Aged About 14 Years Minor And His Represented By His Natural Guardian (Mother) Namely Seema Singh , R/o Hospital Colony, Bishrampur, Police Station Bishrampur , Tehsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. --- Applicants versus Santosh Singh S/o Shri Akshaywar Singh Aged About 41 Years R/o Infront Of Jagarnath Mandir , Kedarpur, Ambikapur , Police Station And Tehsil Ambikapur , District Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. --- Non-Applicant For Applicants : Mr. Sarfaraj Khan, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Sunil Tripathi, Advocate A long with CRR No. 313 of 2020 Santosh Singh S/o Akshaywar Singh Aged About 41 Years Resident Of In Front Of Jagarnath Temple, Kedarpur, P.S. And Tahsil - Ambikapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. ---Applicant RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 Versus 1 - Smt. Seema Singh W/o Santosh Singh Aged About 36 Years Resident Of Hospital Colony, Vishrampur P.S. Vishrampur Tahsil And District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Shahil Singh S/o Santosh Singh Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Seema Singh W/o Santosh Singh, Resident Of Hospital Colony, Vishrampur P.S. Vishrampur Tahsil And District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicants For Applicant : Mr. Sunil Tripathi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 29.07 .202 5 . 1. In criminal revision No. 632/2020 has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that the Revision may kindly be allowed and the impugned order dated 16.01.2020, passed by the Court learned Family Judge {Family Court Surajpur}, may kindly be set aside and enhance the amount of maintenance, at least to Rs 10,000/- per month to applicant no. 1 & Rs 8,000/- per month to Applicant No. 2 (as pleaded in application filed U/s. 127 of Cr.P.C. before the court below), in the interest of Justice.” 3 2. In criminal revision No. 313/2020 has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the revision of the applicant and set-aside the order Impugned dated 16.01.2020 passed in Misc. Criminal case no. 51/2019 by the Learned Family Court Surajpur District Surajpur (C.G.) and also declared that, the non-applicant no. 1 is not legally entitled to get the maintenance in the interest of justice.” 3. Mr. Sunil Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the non-applicant/ husband has submitted that a decree of divorce has already been executed between the parties vide order dated 16.05.2014, and it has been mentioned in paragraph No. 21 of this revision petition that one-time permanent alimony has been awarded to the wife and the son has also attained majority. 4. In view of the above, the matter already stands settled and both the petitions are accordingly disposed of. 5. Let a copy of this order as well as original record of this case be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan