VEERABHADRAPPA K S v. THE PRESIDENT CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY
WP/4565/2025 · 2025-08-07
H T Narendra Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78583 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78583 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30792 WP No. 4565 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4565 OF 2025 (S-DE) BETWEEN:
VEERABHADRAPPA K S S/O SHIVAPPA K AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS BILL COLLECTOR, GODABANAHAL GRAM PANCHAYAT CHITRADURGA TALUK-577 501 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R SHASHIDHARA., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE PRESIDENT CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY GODABANAHAL GRAM PANCHAYAT CHITRADURGA TALUK-577 501.
2.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH, CHITRADURGA-577 501.
3.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH CHITRADURGA-577 501.
4.
PDO, GODABANAHAL GRAM PANCHAYATH CHITRADURGA TALUK-577 501. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KANTHARAJAPPA M G., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R4:
SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2: R3 IS SERVED )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 IN NO. GRA.PAM.AA (1)CCA.R-01/2024 DATED: 02.05.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-H TO THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30792 WP No. 4565 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the suspension
order, dated 02.05.2024, vide Annexure-H, passed by the first respondent.
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Waterman in the fourth respondent – Grama Panchayat. His service was regularized in the year 2007 and he has been promoted as a Bill Collector in the year 2022. At that time, an enquiry was initiated against the petitioner, charge memo has been issued and thereafter, the impugned suspension
order has been passed on 02.05.2024 vide Annexure-H. Even after one year of the issuing of the suspension order, enquiry is not completed. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 17.01.2025 vide Annexure-J, seeking reinstatement of the petitioner into service.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30792 WP No. 4565 of 2025
3. The learned counsel for the respondents submit that the enquiry against the petitioner has already been initiated and enquiry is under progress and within three months, the enquiry will be completed. He further submits that during the period of suspension the respondents are paying the subsistence allowance to the petitioner.
4. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of. Further, if the respondents have not concluded the enquiry within three months, the respondents are hereby
directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 17.01.2025 vide Annexure-J, for re-instatement of the petitioner into service, in accordance with law. It is made clear that the petitioner has to co-operate to the enquiry without taking any time.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 50