MST. FATA ALIAS FATIMA BEGUM v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), AND ORS.
LPA/207/2024 · 2025-05-21
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7858 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7858 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No.3 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
LPA 207/2024 In[OWP 1926/2017] MST. FATA ALIAS FATIMA BEGUM.
...APPELLANT(S)
Through: - Mr. Majid Bashir, Advocate
Vs.
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) AND ORS.
…RESPONDENT(S)
Through:- Mr. Mir Manzoor Ahmad, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 21.05.2025
Learned counsel for the appellant after arguing for a while seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to avail the remedy of statutory appeal against Mutation No. 71, attested by Tehsildar, Pattan, on 5th August, 2014. He further prays for a direction to the Appellate Authority to condone the delay in filing such an appeal. Statement of learned counsel for the appellant is taken on record. This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellant to challenge the Mutation No. 71 supra by availing the remedy of statutory appeal provided under the Jammu and Kashmir Land Revenue Act. We, however, provide that in case MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.05.25
the appeal is filed within a period of four weeks’ from today, the same shall be treated as having been filed within time and shall be decided on merits after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE Srinagar, 21.05.2025
“Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.05.25