[2025:JHHC:19259] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2246 of 2025 ------ Bharat Mandal, age about 30 Years, Son of Mahadeo Mandal, Resident of Village- Sahana, P.O.- Bewa, P.S.- Jamtara, District- Jamtara .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 15-07-2025 I.A. No.8457 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application. Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands rejected being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2246 of 2025 The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 registered under Section111 (2) (ii), 317 (2), 318 (4), 319 (2), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B C D of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and four mobile phones and different SIM Cards have been recovered from his possession and he has defrauded the victims Prasant Kudu, Sarika Pravin Takade, Md. Halim Sk, Korra Santosh to the tune of Rs.39,603/-, Rs.86,632/-, Rs.15,900/- and Rs.6,696/- respectively. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will transfer the amount allegedly defrauded to the bank account of the aforesaid victims without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.01.2025 as is evident from para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.39,603/-, Rs.86,632/-, Rs.15,900/- and Rs.6,696/- respectively in the account of the victims Prasant Kudu, Sarika Pravin Takade, Md. Halim Sk, Korra Santosh without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber, Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/