Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7854 (JHR)

JUGESH NISHAD ALIAS JUGESH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHADN

B.A./2962/2025 · 2025-04-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:11607] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2962 of 2025 ------ Jugesh Nishad @ Jugesh, aged about 35 years, Son of Late Balwant Nishad, resident of H. No. D-30, Kalinga Durga Puja Maidan, Khuntadih, P.O. & P.S.- Sonari, District- Jamshedpur .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sourav Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.12 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 115 (2), 117 (2), 109 (1), 351 (2), 79 and 352 of the B.N.S, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner attempted to murder the informant- Jagdish Nishad. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that for the self-same occurrence, from the side of the petitioner; the sister of the petitioner has also lodged Sonari P.S. Case No.13 of 2025. It is next submitted that there was a free-fight between the parties and the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.01.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.12 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/