PARMATMA YADAV v. MANISH KUMAR SINGH DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER
CAPL/3621/2025 · 2025-10-07
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3621 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Sole opposite party has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly.
2. Learned Standing Counsel representing sole respondent states that in compliance of the order dated 22.5.2025 passed by this Court, sole respondent has passed the order dated 4.10.2025 for payment of salary to the present applicant. As per her submission, no cause of action survives for the instant contempt application, therefore, same may be dismissed as infructuous.
3. In this conspectus, as above, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 8, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Parmatma Yadav .....Applicant(s) Manish Kumar Singh District Basic Education Officer .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad