Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78520 (KAR)

HOSKOTE TOWN SERICULTURIST'S CUM FARMER'S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36569/2018 · 2025-10-30

R Nataraj

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43521 WP No. 36569 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 36569 OF 2018 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: HOSKOTE TOWN SERICULTURIST'S CUM FARMER'S SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. HOSKOTE, T.G. EXTESTION HOSKOTE TOWN BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 114 REP. BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA REDDY .M, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATIVE REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDEKAR VIDE BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT HOSKOTE TALUK-562 114 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 3. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CHOKAHALLI GRAMPANCHAYAT; CHOKKAHALLI VILLAGE, PILLAGUMPE POST, HOSKOTE TALUK, 562 114 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 4. SRI. RAJANNA S/O MUNIYAPPA Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43521 WP No. 36569 of 2018 AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS CHOKKAHALLI VILLAGE PILLAGUMPE POST GRAMPANCHAYAT MEMBER CHOKAHALLI GRAMPANCHAYAT HOSKOTE TALUK-562 114 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 5. C.V. GANESH S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS MEMBER HOSKOTE TOWN SERI CULTURIST'S CUM FARMER'S SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., CHOKKAHALLI VILLAGE, PILLAGUMPE -POST HOSKOTE TALUK-562 114 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 6. D. NARAYANA S/O LATE DODAPPAYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS CHOLAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE PILLAGUMPE -POST HOSKOTE TALUK,-562 114 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 7. CHIKKAPAIYANNA S/O HANUMANTE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS DODDAHULLUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3; RESPONDENT NOS.4 TO 7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED CAUSE TITLE IS AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 29.08.2018) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43521 WP No. 36569 of 2018 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.07.2018 IN APPEAL No.vÁ¥ÀAºÉÆ/¥ÀæPÀgÀt ¸ÀASÉå 1/2015- 16 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 / EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYAT HOSKOTE VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. On the last date, the petition was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51